APP phase two continues to lack shared governance and transparency
If “Ithaca Forever” is meant to be such a positive plan that improves the college, why is the campus community always left in the dark about the plans?
If “Ithaca Forever” is meant to be such a positive plan that improves the college, why is the campus community always left in the dark about the plans?
The meeting was a lot of fluff and a lot of promises. There was no plan outlined for any of the concerns members of the college community has expressed.
Ithaca College needed to reinstate some restrictions on a smaller scale, for everyone’s safety, health and for the ability to attend in-person classes.
For the sake of the college community’s strained relationship with the administration and the board of trustees, a presidential open search is vital.
Each student, staff and faculty member at the college has a responsibility not just to themselves but to the rest of the community to get vaccinated.
The Ithacan has taken down an editorial cartoon published with the May 6 editorial, “Giving Day success comes at an inappropriate time.”
In terms of quality, students are still complaining about the things meant to have changed. The quality of the food remains questionable at times.
Students have complained about the facilities, including the showers, accessibility, elevators, meal plan requirements and poor maintenance.
Similar to now, contingent faculty members found themselves at risk of losing their jobs — and even more, their connections with students.
Stopping surveillance testing requirements presents a threat to campus safety, especially as it comes weeks before Kendall Day and before graduation.
The SGC meeting began a conversation to address racism at the college, but it did nothing to attempt to resolve or repair these issues.
We need to provide students stability and support as they attempt to break out into the workforce to support our national economy.