Editorial: Program won’t be useful if it is not made mandatory
A program of this magnitude and importance needs to be mandatory in order to be impactful.
A program of this magnitude and importance needs to be mandatory in order to be impactful.
Things that may seem overbearing or unnecessary most likely have a very practical explanation and cannot be ignored simply for convenience’s sake.
Even if all the SGC wanted to say was that they interested in initiating an open and honest dialogue, that would have been better than saying nothing.
The case is undoubtedly complex, meaning our response must be complex and nuanced as well. Anything less would be a moral failure on the part of the campus community.
Users need to call upon both their representatives and upon organizations that have more weight behind their voices to stand up for them and their interests.
Homelessness is a systemic problem, yes, but that does not mean that it is impossible to make a difference in a single person’s life.
Why ask people what they think the college should do for their Commencement ceremonies if their students don’t even attend the college yet?
Introducing these taxes basically erases any relief that these scholarships may provide and introduces additional financial burdens for students and their families to shoulder.
When female students say they no longer want to speak in class for fear of being interrupted or being talked down to, there is obviously a larger issue.
Though the policy is more lenient than the FDA’s previous indefinite ban on men who have sex with men donating blood, it is still a backward policy.
Having more time tickets — having more than two a day or having more days of registration — is the best solution, given the current system.
The protesters on Nov. 9 have set an example for what student protesters should do when a controversial speaker comes to campus.